LUCAS OLENIUK / TORONTO STAR
Documents from the Sanofi Pasteur archives help piece together the role of Dr. Leone Farrell in finding the polio cure. From the top: a memo from Jonas Salk; a photo of the bottles and rocking machine Farrell used to produce mass quantities of the virus; an outline of the responsibilities of the members of the Connaught team; and a copy of the polio project budget from Connaught labs.

Toronto's unknown polio soldier
A heroine in an unmarked grave


RITA DALY
TORONTO STAR

In the 50 years since the world first rejoiced in the success of Jonas Salk's polio vaccine, the name and famed accomplishments of the renowned American researcher have grown legendary.

Few, on the other hand, know who Leone Farrell is.

Yet there she was, tucked away in a small Toronto laboratory, a quiet, 50-year-old chemist, who, to Salk's utter delight, figured out how to produce the virus in the vast quantities he needed for the field trial of his vaccine.

It became the biggest medical experiment of all time, involving close to two million children, and Farrell was among the teams of American and Canadian scientists who waited in breathless anticipation for the results to be announced on April 12, 1955. That triumphant day, Salk's life changed forever.

But although Farrell's contribution was recognized by her contemporaries, she returned to work in relative obscurity. She continued to publish research papers well into her 60s and lived to the age of 82. But she died alone. Her gravesite in the Park Lawn Cemetery just west of High Park reveals nothing of the key role she played in eradicating polio. Her remains are buried in Lot 707, in an unmarked grave.


Throughout the first half of the 20th century, polio swept North America in epidemic waves, crippling and killing tens of thousands of children. The poliomyelitis virus entered the body through the mouth, invaded the bloodstream and could be carried to the central nervous system, causing paralysis and, in some cases, death.

Epidemics struck in 1931 and again in 1937. In Toronto, children were kept indoors, swimming pools, parks and churches were closed and the start of school delayed.

Stricken families were quarantined. Another epidemic hit in 1946. The worst in the U.S. came in 1952; Canada's worst year was 1953, when 9,000 children were infected.

News reports appeared daily on the horrors of school-aged children suddenly unable to walk. Others died days after contracting the virus. Originally thought to be a children's disease, polio also struck parents, nurses and teachers; many became permanently imprisoned in iron lungs.

During the 1930s and 1940s, polio researchers throughout the world were on the hunt for a cure. Small breakthroughs were achieved in understanding the virus, but they were often countered by frustrating setbacks, cost being one.

In 1949, Harvard researchers discovered a way to grow the poliovirus in a test tube. Suddenly, the scientific community was in a race to create a vaccine.

Salk made his discovery in 1952, as the worst epidemic yet gripped the United States. While conducting tests in his University of Pittsburgh laboratory, the bespectacled scientist came up with an experimental vaccine containing "killed," or inactivated virus, which could trigger a person's blood to build immunity. His team proved it worked with months and months of tests in monkeys, and later in a small group of volunteers.

Salk now faced another challenge: how to mass-produce the polio virus in order to treat the millions clamouring for it.

North of the border, Connaught Medical Research Laboratories, owned by the University of Toronto, had been conducting its own polio research since the late 1930s. Research was briefly interrupted by the Second World War but resumed before the war ended. According to Canadian medical historian Christopher Rutty, Connaught's reputation as a true academic research centre put scientists like Leone Farrell in a unique position to play a major role in what unfolded over the coming decade.

Unlike the pharmaceutical companies to the south, Connaught's interest lay squarely in scientific research, vaccine production and public health teaching.

"It didn't have to answer to shareholders, it didn't have that corporate thinking and it didn't have competitors. It was really the only one of its kind in Canada," says Rutty, whose doctoral thesis on polio will soon be published in a book titled The Middle Class Plague.

For that reason, the U.S. National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, or March of Dimes — founded by then-president Franklin D. Roosevelt, himself crippled by the disease — had been quietly pouring money into Connaught's polio research. By the late 1940s, the company had set up its own special polio team led by British virologist Dr. Andrew J. Rhodes.

Farrell was asked to join the team in 1952 — the year that Salk made his crucial discovery.

Born in Monkland, a rural community south of Ottawa, Farrell was raised in Toronto. "Very much a lady" is how one of Farrell's colleagues described her, recalling that she always wore suits and heels and kept her hair short and neat.

Leone Norwood Farrell was no ordinary lady, however. She had, by age 29, obtained a PhD in biochemistry at the University of Toronto. It was a rare feat for women in those days; a mere handful of Canadian women each year obtained PhDs in the 1930s.

Farrell joined the staff at Connaught in 1934, 20 years before the polio field trials. Her specialty was the study of fungi, and she had spent two years working as a chemist looking at yeasts in honey for the National Research Council of Canada. She was hired by Connaught to do studies on staphylococcus toxoids and conducted significant studies on antibiotics, penicillin and the prevention of bacterial infections such as diphtheria, cholera and whooping cough.

Farrell lived alone on the second floor of a two-bedroom balcony apartment on the corner of Avenue Rd. and Oriole Parkway and each day traveled the six kilometres south to her laboratory at the U of T campus. Not much more is known of her personal life; her colleagues remember her dedication and skill but remember little about her interests, her habits, her passions.

In 1943, Connaught — by then a world leader in the development and manufacture of vaccines, insulin and penicillin — purchased Knox College and moved its research and production operations to the towering Gothic revival building on Spadina Crescent.

It was during this period that Farrell came up with a unique method of gently "rocking" large bottles containing the pertussis bacteria to stimulate its growth for production of a whooping cough vaccine. This discovery would prove to be crucial 10 years later in the race against polio.

Connaught's first major polio breakthrough came in 1951. Earlier, its cancer researchers had developed the first synthetic medium, Medium 199. Other Connaught scientists tried the medium for growing the polio virus on monkey kidney tissue and found that the virus rapidly multiplied in the chemically pure fluid. Suddenly, it was Farrell's job to find a way to produce the virus in bulk quantities.

The production race was on.

"Leone was probably the most experienced person in that atmosphere. Her specialty had been the mass production of bacterial cultures," said 79-year-old Frank Shimada, a researcher who was part of the testing process and, in his mid-20s at the time, the youngest member of the polio project.

In the course of regular meetings held at the Spadina lab in 1952, Farrell, Shimada and others discussed how to grow the virus, what containers to use, how much medium to use. It was constant trial and error. Farrell was "a good person and a team player," he recalled. "She knew what she was doing. She was a classic researcher and disciplined in her work to the extent that she knew you laid out a plan and followed it carefully for things to get done."

It took months, but research would finally prove the rocking-bottle method used in Farrell's pertussis studies, later to be called the "Toronto technique," was the solution they'd been looking for.

Using large, rectangular 5-litre bottles, Farrell adhered a tiny piece of monkey kidney tissue cells to the inside glass, added the medium and, over the course of several days, gently rocked the bottles on specially built machines to agitate the fluid and spur cell production.

The bottles were kept in incubator rooms warmed to a body temperature of 37C. A few degrees higher and the entire batch could be destroyed. The polio virus was then added to infect the cells and the rocking continued for several more days. The gratifying result was an abundance of live polio virus.

With a mass vaccine now in sight, Connaught in 1953 was handed the prestigious and painstaking task of supplying almost all of the 3,000 litres of virus fluids needed for Salk's field trials. Farrell remained in charge of what now became a vast and intricate production involving many more monkeys, medium and bottles, more buildings and more staff to train. During this period, at least 165 monkeys a week were required to produce the virus, Rutty said.

"This all had to be done from the ground up," recalled Shimada. "They had to build labs, incubators, the whole bit. Techniques had to be developed right down to special washing instructions to clean the bottles."

Farrell was instrumental in the design and implementation of it all — an achievement recognized in the dry, bureaucratic language of an unsigned career summary placed in her employment file.

"The breadth of these accomplishments bears testimony to the knowledge and mental fertility enjoyed by Dr. Farrell. Never was she lacking in basic ideas of how to accomplish her scientific goals," reads the summary, which is now part of the Connaught archival collection.

"She was a very serious person. She was always doing research. It was always `try this, try that,'" recalls former colleague Stephanie Schenk. Schenk, now retired, joined Connaught as a young research assistant in early 1954, by which time Farrell and others were already working round-the-clock to produce large volumes of the live virus.

"I didn't know Dr. Farrell all that well, but back then everyone was so wrapped up in their work. They were so dedicated, it was unbelievable."

In the crucial months leading up to the field trials, bottles of the live virus were packed in ice, then placed inside dairy cans and loaded onto a station wagon at the rear doors of the Spadina building. From there the precious cargo was raced twice weekly to the U.S., crossing the border at Detroit on its way to two American drug firms where the virus was "killed," or inactivated, for Salk's use.

Salk, in a signed letter to Connaught director Robert Defries shortly before the trial results were announced in 1955, thanked the Connaught team for their "Herculean task" in providing the virus. When the momentous day arrived — April 12, 1955 — hundreds of scientists gathered in Ann Arbor, Mich., where the results were being announced. In Toronto, nearly 700 doctors, technicians and nurses crowded into the Crystal Ballroom at the King Edward Hotel to watch the report on two dozen TV sets installed specifically for the event.

The late-edition headlines that day said it all — the Salk polio vaccine had proven safe and 80 to 90 per cent effective in tests on children across the United States and parts of Canada and Finland. With the news, mass immunizations for millions of Canadian and American schoolchildren and their parents immediately got under way.

In the days following the announcement, Canadian journalists rushed to the Toronto lab for interviews and photographs. The faces of the Connaught team, including Farrell's, were splashed across the front page of the Globe and Mail. A proud Defries took his team out for dinner at the Royal York Hotel.

"I was totally lost in the limelight," recalled Shimada. "That was the moment when you thought, `My God, we're making history.' Until then there wasn't any of that, because that wasn't our purpose."

In the months and years since, some Canadian politicians have felt Connaught — later swallowed up by pharmaceutical giant Sanofi Pasteur — did not get the recognition from Americans that it deserved. Rutty argues, however, that Salk was in an impossible situation because so many people had been involved in helping tie all the pieces together, including researchers in his own lab who also felt slighted. Salk, for instance, appeared alone on the cover of Time magazine in 1954.

Even so, Farrell has pretty much been written out of history. University of Victoria women's studies professor Marianne Gosztonyi Ainley, whose book Essays on Canadian Women and Science reflects on the historical record of women scientists, hadn't heard of Farrell or her accomplishments. Her case, Ainley said, raises a lot of questions not just about who she was but about who gets credit for scientific discoveries and whose name gets perpetuated.

"The public often has trouble understanding that scientific discoveries are team efforts," she said. "Farrell should be remembered. Her accomplishments should be remembered."

Last week, a commemorative piece on Salk published in the Journal of the American Medical Association recounted the contributions of scientists, including Salk, to "one of the greatest achievements of the 20th century." Once again, there is no mention of the role played by Connaught, by Farrell, or anyone, for that matter, who was part of the polio effort in Toronto — names like Defries, Rhodes, Shimada, Taylor, Macmorine, Wood, Graham, Franklin, Morgan, Parker or Morton.

Shimada says that if Farrell were alive today, it's doubtful she would care.

"When you're in medicine, what greater accolade can you get than knowing you helped save thousands of kids from becoming paralyzed? The important thing is that people know in their own hearts they are contributors. That's what it's all about."

The former Connaught laboratories building on Spadina Crescent is slated to undergo a major renovation to house fine arts. The high-ceilinged hallway on the second floor where Farrell worked is now quiet. The labs are gone; a few classrooms and offices are in their place.

The only evidence of those exciting days are three heavy wooden doors, behind which the live virus was kept cold prior to transport.

They remain bolted shut.

Background on Viral Vaccine Development

What is the standard development and manufacturing process for viral vaccines?

Viral vaccines protect individuals from disease by eliciting an immune response, which will prevent disease if an individual is subsequently infected with a disease-causing strain of the virus.

There are three types of licensed viral vaccines: subunit, killed, and live-attenuated.  Subunit vaccines are purified viral proteins.  Killed and live-attenuated viral vaccines are made from virus purified from a medium into which a viral “seed” has been introduced.  Rotarix and RotaTeq are live-attenuated viral vaccines.

There are a variety of media used in the manufacture of viral vaccines.  These include:

Rotarix was produced in Vero cells.

Live-attenuated viral vaccines are manufactured by purifying whole virus from infected cells.  Because the virus has been attenuated, or weakened, and no longer is able to cause disease, the purified live virus is used as the vaccine.

The general production process for a live-attenuated viral vaccine can be divided into four stages:

Vaccine manufacturers are required to have controls in place to ensure the vaccine product’s identity, potency, quality, and purity.

What steps do manufacturers and FDA take to assess the quality of viral vaccines during the production process?

FDA requires vaccine manufacturers to implement certain manufacturing practices to assure the quality of the viral “seed” which is used to generate large amounts of virus needed for vaccine manufacture, the cell culture medium in which the virus will grow, and any components added in the manufacturing process.

Vaccine manufacturers must conduct a variety of quality assurance tests throughout the manufacturing process, including tests for vaccine sterility and potency.  Samples of each finished vaccine are tested by the manufacturer prior to market release, and FDA may also perform additional testing prior to market release.  The specific types of testing required vary from product to product.

What FDA regulations and guidance apply to the production of vaccines?

The general standards for assuring the quality of vaccines intended to be administered to humans can be found in 21 CFR 610¹

Vaccine manufacturers are required to implement “current good manufacturing practices,” as described in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and in 21 CFR 210² and 21 CFR 211³.

On March 2, 2010, FDA issued a Final Guidance for Industry entitled “Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications⁴”.

Has testing for circoviruses such as PCV1 been required as part of vaccine development?

Circoviruses have not been associated with illnesses in humans, and FDA has not required the routine testing of vaccines for these viruses.  Current FDA guidance, released in March 2010, recommends that manufacturers consider testing for these agents.  FDA introduced this recommendation as an additional precaution for vaccines manufactured with animal-based components.  The agency is reviewing the current situation and may update its approach based

Back to page