I wonder if this outbreak came after their Prevnar
Shots?Pneumococcal Strain Linked to US Pink Eye Outbreak
Thu January 30, 2003 03:01 PM ET
By Paul Simao
ATLANTA (Reuters) - A strain of the sometimes deadly pneumococcus bacteria
has been linked for the first time to an outbreak of conjunctivitis among
young children in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention said on Thursday.
A study published in the CDC's weekly morbidity and mortality report
concluded that a type of streptococcus pneumoniae was responsible for a
flurry of conjunctivitis infections last autumn at an elementary school in
Maine.
Conjunctivitis, commonly known as pink eye, is an infection of the outer
layer of the eye. A number of bacteria can cause the infection, and there
are viral and allergic forms as well. The bacterial form of the disease is
typically marked by stringy discharge, swelling, redness and itching.
Outbreaks of the pneumococcal form of conjunctivitis had been identified
previously, but never in young children. A CDC epidemiologist said it was
possible the strain was a common, but previously unrecognized, cause of
conjunctivitis in children.
Most cases of bacterial conjunctivitis are easily cured with antibiotic eye
drops. But the highly contagious nature of the disease allows it to spread
quickly from person to person, usually through contact with eye secretions.
Federal health officials say this is what likely occurred in late September
and early October at an elementary school in Westbrook, Maine, where more
than 100 kindergarten and first and second graders developed conjunctivitis
or its symptoms.
Swab cultures on more than two dozen children were positive for the
pneumococcal strain, the same one that had caused an outbreak of
conjunctivitis among college students in New Hampshire earlier in the year.
A further investigation revealed that the outbreak in Maine had widened to
include family members of those infected as well as kids attending other
schools and child care centers in the northeastern state.
"We have seen outbreaks before of this particular strain, but never in young
kids," said Brendan Flannery, an epidemiologist with the CDC's National
Center for Infectious Diseases.
Flannery, however, cautioned that the outbreak did not signal a serious new
health problem because the strain responsible for the outbreak appeared to
be confined to the eyes.
None of the infected kids in Maine became seriously ill.
"This strain is not very good about infecting either the lungs to cause
pneumonia or to get into the bloodstream to cause invasive disease,"
Flannery said. Various forms of pneumococcus kill about 1.2 million children
around the world each year, according to estimates from the World Health
Organization. In the United States, it is the most common cause of bacterial
meningitis. The CDC said conjunctivitis transmission could be prevented in
schools if children and teachers frequently washed their hands with soap and
water and limited the sharing of objects in classrooms.
Health experts also advise parents and family members of those infected with
the disease to avoid the sharing of towels, washcloths or handkerchiefs at
home.

http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/5124723.htm
Posted on Fri, Feb. 07, 2003
U MEDICAL STUDY: Pneumonia vaccine not as effective as thought
BY TOM MAJESKI
Pioneer Press
The pneumonia vaccine booster shot normally given to frail and elderly
people five years after their initial immunization does not protect them for
life as was previously thought, researchers at the University of Minnesota
have found. The discovery is important because more than 60,000 Americans a
year die of pneumonia, making it one of the top five killers of people 65
and older.
The study published in today's Journal of the American Geriatrics
Society raises the possibility that patients most at risk of contracting and
dying from pneumococcal infections should be vaccinated every year or every
other year. "A lot of people haven't even had a primary vaccination, and a
lot of patients aren't aware of the need for a booster,'' said lead
investigator Thomas Lackner, a clinical professor in the university's
College of Pharmacy. "Our elderly population is growing week by week, so
it's affecting more people.''
However, no one knows yet whether it's safe to give high-risk patients
annual pneumococcal shots, so Lackner and his colleagues plan to study the
question. He also said researchers should develop a more effective vaccine.
Until more is learned, Lackner said elderly patients and others at high risk
should talk to their doctors about getting a vaccination or a booster. The
shots are normally offered at the same time as the annual flu vaccinations.
Besides causing most pneumonias, pneumococcal bacteria can trigger
various blood infections, including meningitis, a disease that kills 80
percent of its elderly victims. Many such bacteria have become resistant to
antibiotics, making treatment difficult. When the vaccine was introduced in
the 1980s, experts thought one shot would protect a patient for life. Later
studies showed that was not true, so high-risk patients were advised to get
booster shots five years after the first vaccination.
But even that strategy offers no lifetime guarantee against pneumonia,
Lackner and his colleagues discovered in their study of 67 patients at six
Twin Cities nursing homes. All had received their initial dose of the
pneumococcal vaccine. Once antibody levels were measured, the researchers
gave each participant a booster shot. They then measured the antibody levels
at one month, six months and one year later.
Patients showed a significant rise in their protective antibody levels
one month after the booster shot. But by the end of the year, the antibody
counts had dropped to levels equal to or below the starting points,
indicating the vaccine no longer protected them. Lackner said patients in
the study tolerated the booster shots well. The only side effects were a
little tenderness and warmness at the injection site that disappeared in a
couple of days.

Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:36 pm (PDT)
It isn't just antibiotic overuse which is causing an increase in MRSA. A
major cause is Prevnar which wipes out some of our normal flora. The normal
flora has a method of preventing staph...Please read this: http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/?p=119
Quote: The most alarming of the replacement effects with Prevnar is how
staph moves in when pneumo is taken out. Described here:"A trial with a
7-valent pneumococcal-conjugate vaccine in children with recurrent acute
otitis media showed a shift in pneumococcal colonisation towards non-vaccine
serotypes and an increase in Staphylococcus aureus-related acute otitis
media after vaccination"
"These findings suggest a natural competition between colonisation with
vaccine-type pneumococci and S aureus, which might explain the increase in S
aureus-related otitis media after vaccination. "
How does it work?
The bactericidal activity of Streptococcus pneumoniae toward Staphylococcus
aureus is mediated by hydrogen peroxide. Catalase eliminated this activity.
Pneumococci grown anaerobically or genetically lacking pyruvate oxidase (SpxB)
were not bactericidal, nor were nonpneumococcal streptococci. These results
provide a possible mechanistic explanation for the interspecies interference
observed in epidemiologic studies.
S pneumo poisons staph with hydrogen peroxide.
So what does that mean?
This study concludes:
Conclusions
Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage, specifically of vaccine-type strains, is
negatively associated with S aureus carriage in children. The implications
of these findings in the pneumococcal vaccine era require further
investigation. You can't lock out pneumo with the vaccine without opening a
window for staph. The change in the "ecosystem" extends beyond those who are
vaccinated with Prevnar, as well. Because of herd immunity, the phenomenon
can be seen in the whole population.
Back to page